<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>sam schechner dot com</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.samschechner.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.samschechner.com/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.samschechner.com,2010://1</id>
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.samschechner.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1" title="sam schechner dot com" />
    <updated>2010-04-11T15:27:41Z</updated>
    <subtitle>selected published articles</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.2</generator>
 
<entry>
    <title>OPRAH: GIVE ME THE NIGHT</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.samschechner.com/2010/04/oprah_give_me_the_night.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.samschechner.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=27" title="OPRAH: GIVE ME THE NIGHT" />
    <id>tag:www.samschechner.com,2010://1.27</id>
    
    <published>2010-04-08T06:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2010-04-11T15:27:41Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Once she’s done with daytime, Oprah Winfrey plans to move to television’s prime evening hours. The move is a boon for Ms. Winfrey’s coming cable channel, but poses a challenge as the host’s big TV audience continues to splinter.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>The Wall Street Journal</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="articles" />
            <category term="featured" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.samschechner.com/">
        <![CDATA[<h2 class="entry-subhead"> The Queen of Daytime Is Becoming Nocturnal; <br> A Big Bet for Her Network </h2> <font size=1><em>(The Wall Street Journal, April 8, 2010)</em> (<a href="http://www.samschechner.com/WSJ_-D001-20100408.pdf">PDF of original</a>; <a href=" http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303720604575170051526127616.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">link</a> to full story on wsj.com; outtakes from Oprah interview on WSJ's Speakeasy blog: <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2010/04/08/oprah-winfrey-talks-why-shes-moving-to-cable/">Oprah Winfrey Talks</a> and <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2010/04/08/oprah-winfrey-talks-part-two-her-vision-for-her-new-network/"> Oprah Winfrey Talks, Part Two</a>
) </font><br> <br>

<p>Watch the WSJ “News Hub” segment on the story:<br />
<object id="wsj_fp" width="365" height="259"><param name="movie" value="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/main.swf"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><param name="flashvars" value="videoGUID={F6E3086C-7942-4F83-86F5-6FADE960CB35}&playerid=1000&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://wsj.vo.llnwd.net/o28/players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/"name="flashPlayer"></param><embed src="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/main.swf" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"flashVars="videoGUID={F6E3086C-7942-4F83-86F5-6FADE960CB35}&playerid=1000&plyMediaEnabled=1&configURL=http://wsj.vo.llnwd.net/o28/players/&autoStart=false" base="http://s.wsj.net/media/swf/" name="flashPlayer" width="365" height="259" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" swLiveConnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></object></p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>By SAM SCHECHNER</p>

<p><b>America's daytime talk-show queen</b> is heading out at night.</p>

<p>Oprah Winfrey plans to announce Thursday that she will host an evening show on her new cable network. The aptly named "Oprah's Next Chapter," an hourlong show, will probably debut late next year.</p>

<p>Ms. Winfrey's new show, which could air as many as two or three times a week, will take Ms. Winfrey out of the studio setting that has been her home for nearly 25 years and follow her around the globe for conversations in places such as Egypt and China. "I'm going to take viewers with me, going to take celebrities I want to interview with me" around the world, Ms. Winfrey said in an interview. </p>

<p>The larger task will be taking advertisers and viewers along to the new Oprah Winfrey Network, or OWN. Ms. Winfrey right now has a vast audience, many women at home during the day, who follow by the millions her every tip on what to read, eat, wear, and buy. But the new network will be programming 24 hours a day. And Ms. Winfrey herself will face a formidable lineup of evening reality shows. Some, like NBC's "The Biggest Loser," CBS's "Undercover Boss," or Fox's "American Idol," include the inspirational and instructional tales that Ms. Winfrey excels at.</p>

<p>The new show is one of more than a dozen programs that OWN has lined up as it moves toward its scheduled debut on Jan. 1. A 50-50 joint venture between Ms. Winfrey's Harpo Inc. and cable programmer Discovery Communications Inc., the new network plans to give a detailed look at its shows in a presentation to advertisers Thursday. </p>

<p>"Oprah's Next Chapter" is a crucial ingredient for the new network. Ms. Winfrey, 56 years old, has until now said little publicly about her on-air role at OWN after "The Oprah Winfrey Show" ends in 2011…</p>

<p><a href=" http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303720604575170051526127616.html?mod=googlenews_wsj ">Continue reading "OPRAH: GIVE ME THE NIGHT" on wsj.com »»</a><br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>IPAD STARS IN TV COMEDY</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.samschechner.com/2010/04/ipad_stars_in_tv_comedy.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.samschechner.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=28" title="IPAD STARS IN TV COMEDY" />
    <id>tag:www.samschechner.com,2010://1.28</id>
    
    <published>2010-04-02T05:46:33Z</published>
    <updated>2010-04-12T16:02:15Z</updated>
    
    <summary>In February, an Apple Inc. marketing executive traveled to a Los Angeles sound-stage with a special payload: two early iPads. The tablet computers were being escorted for a top-secret appearance on ABC&apos;s sitcom &quot;Modern Family.&quot; The episode, so close to the iPad&apos;s release, highlights the increasingly blurry line between entertainment and marketing. </summary>
    <author>
        <name>The Wall Street Journal</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="articles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.samschechner.com/">
        <![CDATA[<h2 class="entry-subhead">Apple Supplied Tablets for Secret Shoot;<br>'They Asked Us Not to Tweet About It'</h2>
<font size=1><em>(The Wall Street Journal, April 2, 2010)</em>
(<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303395904575158423205303704.html?mod=wsj_share_twitter">Link</a> to story on wsj.com)</font><br>
<br>
<img src="http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/OB-IA242_Modpad_G_20100401203956.jpg" width="365">]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>By SAM SCHECHNER and SUZANNE VRANICA</p>

<p><b>In February, an Apple Inc. marketing executive traveled to</b> a Los Angeles sound-stage with a special payload: two early iPads. The tablet computers were being escorted for a top-secret appearance on ABC's sitcom "Modern Family."</p>

<p>The episode aired Wednesday evening before about 9.5 million viewers, according to Nielsen Co. In it, geeky father character Phil Dunphy pines for an iPad, whose April 3 release coincides with his birthday. "It's like Steve Jobs and God got together to say 'We love you, Phil,"' the character said of the coincidence, referring to Apple's chief executive.</p>

<p>The episode, so close to the iPad's release, highlights the increasingly blurry line between entertainment and marketing. Years ago, real products made only brief appearances in the background of shows. Now brands often get co-staring roles in some of the most popular programs on television.</p>

<p>"It was a very highly guarded guest star," said Steve Levitan, the show's co-creator. Apple did not ask the show staff to sign a non-disclosure agreement, Mr. Levitan said, "but they asked us not to tweet about it."</p>

<p>"Modern Family" writers hatched the iPad idea themselves, shortly before the multimedia device was officially announced in January, Mr. Levitan said. They had planned to….</p>

<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303395904575158423205303704.html?mod=wsj_share_twitter">Continue reading "IPAD STARS IN TV COMEDY" on wsj.com »»</a></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>LOCAL TV STATIONS FACE A FUZZY FUTURE</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.samschechner.com/2009/02/local_tv_stations_face_a_fuzzy.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.samschechner.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=26" title="LOCAL TV STATIONS FACE A FUZZY FUTURE" />
    <id>tag:www.samschechner.com,2009://1.26</id>
    
    <published>2009-02-10T05:10:02Z</published>
    <updated>2010-04-10T19:35:56Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Local television stations dominated the TV business for more than half a century. Now, with their viewership in decline and ad revenue on a downward spiral, many local TV stations face the prospect of being cut out of the picture.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>The Wall Street Journal</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="articles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.samschechner.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><font size=1><em>(The Wall Street Journal, Feb. 10, 2009)</em><br />
(<a href="http://samschechner.com/WSJ_-A001-20090210.pdf">PDF of original</a>; <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123422910357065971.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">Link</a> to story on wsj.com)</font><br><br />
<img src=http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/OB-DC402_tvdeat_D_20090209205607.jpg><br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>By SAM SCHECHNER and REBECCA DANA</p>

<p><b>LAS VEGAS -- Lisa Howfield, general manager of KVBC,</b> the NBC affiliate here, watched last year as the broadcast-television business began to shrink. She started cutting. She combined departments. She made do with old equipment, and did away with luxuries like yearly sales getaways.</p>

<p>In December and January, she laid off 15 employees, or 6% of her staff. After the weatherman left last month, one of the morning news anchors took on both jobs. "It's like a bad roller-coaster ride," says Ms. Howfield. Her station's full-day viewership is down 7.7% this TV season from the same period last year, according to Nielsen Co., and Ms. Howfield expects her ad revenue in 2009 will be down 30% from 2008.</p>

<p>Local television stations like Ms. Howfield's dominated the TV business for more than half a century. They inspired the term "network": a web of Channel 7s and 11s that delivered shows from ABC, CBS, NBC -- and later, Fox -- plus local news, syndicated reruns and talk shows. Because the stations owned the licenses to the airwaves that broadcast TV signals, big networks couldn't distribute content without them. In turn, local stations became the vehicles for the greatest mass-market advertising blitz in history.</p>

<p>Now, with their viewership in decline and ad revenue on a downward spiral, many local TV stations face the prospect of being cut out of the picture. Executives at some major networks are beginning to ...</p>

<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123422910357065971.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">Continue reading "LOCAL TV STATIONS FACE A FUZZY FUTURE" on wsj.com »»</a></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>WHEN YOUR POLITICAL OPINION ISN&apos;T YOURS ALONE</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.samschechner.com/2008/10/when_your_political_opinion_is_1.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.samschechner.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=25" title="WHEN YOUR POLITICAL OPINION ISN'T YOURS ALONE" />
    <id>tag:www.samschechner.com,2008://1.25</id>
    
    <published>2008-10-10T05:17:20Z</published>
    <updated>2010-04-10T19:31:59Z</updated>
    
    <summary>CNN has aired live feedback from a focus group of Ohio voters for all of the debates held since September. Some have called the readout addictive, others find it distracting. But live feedback graphics may have another effect&quot; Recent psychological experiments suggest they can influence viewers&apos; judgments. That might give tiny focus groups outsize influence, especially over undecideds. But there is a broader question: How much of our political opinions are our own?</summary>
    <author>
        <name>The Wall Street Journal</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="articles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.samschechner.com/">
        <![CDATA[<h2 class="entry-subhead"> Broadcasts of Political Debates <br> That Include Live Audience Feedback <br> Can Influence What You're Thinking<br>-- Hecklers Can, Too</h2> <font size=1><em>(The Wall Street Journal, Oct. 10, 2008)</em> (<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122359949981721549.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">Link</a> to story on wsj.com) (Listen to <a href=http://www.onthemedia.org/transcripts/2008/10/17/03>interview</a> on this story from WNYC's "On the Media")</font><br> <br>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>By SAM SCHECHNER </p>

<p><b>During Tuesday night's</b> presidential debate, Sen. Barack Obama was talking about health care, and most of 25 undecided voters in Columbus, Ohio, liked what they heard. They turned knobs on small, wireless dials in their hands -- and a graph representing their immediate reaction was aired live to about 9.2 million people watching CNN.</p>

<p>CNN has aired these squiggly lines live on the bottom of the screen for all of the debates held since September. Some have called the readout addictive, others find it distracting.</p>

<p>But live feedback graphics may have another effect. Recent psychological experiments suggest they can influence viewers' judgments. That might give tiny focus groups outsize influence, especially over undecideds. But there is a broader question: How much of our political opinions are our own? …</p>

<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122359949981721549.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">Continue reading "WHEN YOUR POLITICAL OPINION ISN'T YOURS ALONE" on wsj.com »»</a><br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>NUCLEAR AMBITIONS: AMATEUR SCIENTISTS GET A REACTION FROM FUSION</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.samschechner.com/2008/08/nuclear_ambitions_amateur_scie_1.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.samschechner.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=23" title="NUCLEAR AMBITIONS: AMATEUR SCIENTISTS GET A REACTION FROM FUSION" />
    <id>tag:www.samschechner.com,2008://1.23</id>
    
    <published>2008-08-18T05:30:05Z</published>
    <updated>2009-02-11T02:44:48Z</updated>
    
    <summary>A small subculture of gearheads, amateur physicists and science-fiction fans who are trying to build fusion reactors in their basements, backyards and home laboratories.  Many of these hobbyists call themselves &quot;fusioneers,&quot; and have formed a loosely knit community that numbers more than 100 world-wide. Getting into their elite &quot;Neutron Club&quot; requires building a tabletop reactor that successfully fuses hydrogen isotopes and glows like a miniature star. Only 42 have qualified; some have T-shirts that read &quot;Fusion -- been there...done that.&quot;</summary>
    <author>
        <name>The Wall Street Journal</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="articles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.samschechner.com/">
        <![CDATA[<h2 class="entry-subhead">Homemade 'Fusors' Glow,<br>But Don't Produce Power;<br>Joining the 'Neutron Club'</h2>
<font size=1><em>(The Wall Street Journal, Aug. 18, 2008)</em>
(<a href="http://www.samschechner.com/WSJ_-A001-20080818.pdf">PDF of original</a>; <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121901740078248225.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">Link</a> to story on wsj.com)</font><br>
<br><br>
The story also comes with a video:<br>
<object width="365" height="305"><param name="movie" value=" http://www.youtube.com/v/LJL3RQ4I-iE&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src=" http://www.youtube.com/v/LJL3RQ4I-iE&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="365" height="305"></embed></object> <br><br><br>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>By SAM SCHECHNER</p>

<p><b>PITTSBURGH -- In the garage of his</b> house, Frank Sanns spends nights tinkering with one of his prized possessions: a working nuclear-fusion reactor.</p>

<p>Mr. Sanns, 51 years old, is part of a small subculture of gearheads, amateur physicists and science-fiction fans who are trying to build fusion reactors in their basements, backyards and home laboratories. Mr. Sanns, who owns a banquet hall here, believes he's on track to make fusion a viable power source.</p>

<p>"I'm a dreamer," he says.</p>

<p>Many of these hobbyists call themselves "fusioneers," and have formed a loosely knit community that numbers more than 100 world-wide. Getting into their elite "Neutron Club" requires building a tabletop reactor that successfully fuses hydrogen isotopes and glows like a miniature star. Only 42 have qualified; some have T-shirts that read "Fusion -- been there...done that."</p>

<p>Called fusors and based on ...</p>

<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121901740078248225.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">Continue reading "NUCLEAR AMBITIONS: AMATEUR SCIENTISTS GET A REACTION FROM FUSION" on wsj.com »»</a></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>AS PAPERS CUT, TRIBUNE UPDATES TV NEWS</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.samschechner.com/2008/08/as_papers_cut_tribune_updates.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.samschechner.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=22" title="AS PAPERS CUT, TRIBUNE UPDATES TV NEWS" />
    <id>tag:www.samschechner.com,2008://1.22</id>
    
    <published>2008-08-01T05:15:15Z</published>
    <updated>2009-02-11T02:44:05Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Tribune Co. is slashing staff and space at newspapers across the country. But in another old-media business -- local television news -- it&apos;s moving in the opposite direction. KSWB-TV in San Diego, which has hired a staff of nearly 50 to produce the station&apos;s first in-house news broadcasts in nearly three years. The new programs, which debut Friday, will be radically different from the old, with a format that borrows from conventions of cable television and incorporates interactive elements of the Web. Morning anchor Arthel Neville will wander an open set, chatting with reporters, as well as with &quot;Jack the Cop,&quot; a former sergeant for the San Diego County Sheriff&apos;s Department. Some correspondents could join via Web cam. If the format works well, the company could import elements to other parts of its empire.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>The Wall Street Journal</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="articles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.samschechner.com/">
        <![CDATA[<h2 class="entry-subhead">Stations Add Staff,<br>as Industry Swoons;<br>Making a 'Mega Map'</h2>
<font size=1><em>(The Wall Street Journal, Aug. 1, 2008)</em>
(<a href="http://www.samschechner.com/WSJ_-B001-20080801.pdf">PDF of original</a>; <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121755401663603161.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">Link</a> to story on wsj.com)</font><br>
<br>
<img src=http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/MK-AR003_TVNEWS_20080731155800.jpg>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>by SAM SCHECHNER</p>

<p><b>Tribune Co. is slashing staff</b> and space at newspapers across the country. But in another old-media business -- local television news -- it's moving in the opposite direction.</p>

<p>Nearly half of Tribune's 23 broadcast stations are expanding or launching local news operations, many of them hiring staff as a result. The biggest investment is in KSWB-TV in San Diego, which has hired a staff of nearly 50 to produce the station's first in-house news broadcasts in nearly three years.</p>

<p>KSWB abandoned its original newscast in 2005 to save money. The new programs, which debut Friday, will be radically different from the old, with a format that borrows from conventions of cable television and incorporates interactive elements of the Web. Morning anchor Arthel Neville will wander an open set, chatting with reporters, as well as with "Jack the Cop," a former sergeant for the San Diego County Sheriff's Department. Some correspondents could join via Web cam. If the format works well, the company could import elements to other parts of its empire.</p>

<p>"It's practically like there's a government regulation that regulates how a TV station sounds," says Lee Abrams, Tribune's chief innovation officer. He notes that some of local-news conventions are fodder for parody, from "The Simpsons" to the 2004 movie "Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy," which stars Will Ferrell as a pompous 1970s news anchor -- and is set in San Diego. "It's out of date and ready for reinvention," he says. ...</p>

<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121755401663603161.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">Continue reading "AS PAPERS CUT, TRIBUNE UPDATES TV NEWS" on wsj.com »»</a></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>WILL &apos;BRIGHT GREEN&apos; BRING DISCOVERY THE LONG GREEN?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.samschechner.com/2008/03/will_bright_green_bring_discov.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.samschechner.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=21" title="WILL 'BRIGHT GREEN' BRING DISCOVERY THE LONG GREEN?" />
    <id>tag:www.samschechner.com,2008://1.21</id>
    
    <published>2008-03-21T05:06:24Z</published>
    <updated>2009-02-11T02:43:15Z</updated>
    
    <summary>On June 4, Discovery Communications plans to launch an around-the-clock TV network called Planet Green -- part of an effort that will cost $100 million over two years. If successful, the channel&apos;s &quot;eco-lifestyle&quot; brand could prove lucrative, attracting advertiser-friendly viewers who are willing to pay extra for hybrid cars and organic food. But Discovery must avoid being snared in a potential green-marketing backlash -- or, worse, found guilty of making boring TV shows.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>The Wall Street Journal</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="articles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.samschechner.com/">
        <![CDATA[<h2 class="entry-subhead">Eco-Channel Chases Ads,<br>While Fleeing Backlash;<br>Consoling the Composter</h2>
<font size=1><em>(The Wall Street Journal, March 21, 2008)</em>
(<a href="http://www.samschechner.com/WSJ_-B001-20080321.pdf">PDF of original</a>;<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120605848597453427.html">Link</a> to story on wsj.com)</font><br>
<br>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>by SAM SCHECHNER</p>

<p><b>Comedian Annabelle Gurwitch is trying</b> to show a bunch of fraternity brothers the virtues of saving water. So, while a TV camera rolls, she strips down to gym shorts and bra, and jumps into a low-flow shower with one of them.</p>

<p>Ms. Gurwitch's conservation-minded show is part of a two-year, $100 million push by Discovery Communications LLC to launch an around-the-clock TV network called Planet Green. If successful, its "eco-lifestyle" brand could prove lucrative, attracting advertiser-friendly viewers who are willing to pay extra for hybrid cars and organic food. But Discovery must avoid being snared in a potential green-marketing backlash -- or, worse, found guilty of making boring TV shows. ...</p>

<p><a href=""http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120605848597453427.html">Continue reading "WILL 'BRIGHT GREEN' BRING DISCOVERY THE LONG GREEN?" on wsj.com »»</a></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>KEEPING LOVE ALIVE</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.samschechner.com/2008/02/keeping_love_alive.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.samschechner.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=18" title="KEEPING LOVE ALIVE" />
    <id>tag:www.samschechner.com,2008://1.18</id>
    
    <published>2008-02-08T05:07:23Z</published>
    <updated>2009-02-11T02:42:52Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Most couples find that the dizzying, almost-narcotic feeling of early love gives way to a calmer bond. Now, a group of researchers is using brain imaging to investigate how a small class of men and women who seem to live in the thrall of early love despite years of marriage, busy jobs and other daily demands that normally chip away at passion. The study could help reveal the workings of lifelong passion.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>The Wall Street Journal</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="articles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.samschechner.com/">
        <![CDATA[<h2 class="entry-subhead">Scientists are probing why some married couples can maintain the spark for years.<br></h2>
<font size=1><em>(The Wall Street Journal, Feb. 8, 2008)</em>
(<a href="http://www.samschechner.com/WSJ_-W001-20080208.pdf">PDF of original</a>;<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120243044114252137.html?mod=hps_us_inside_today">Link</a> to story on wsj.com)</font><br>
<br>
The story also comes with a video:
<object width="365" height="305"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/lDazasy68aU&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/lDazasy68aU&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="365" height="305"></embed></object>
<br><br><br>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>by SAM SCHECHNER</p>

<p><b>Ann Tucker is pushing a shopping</b> cart through the produce section of a supermarket in Plainview, N.Y., when she turns to kiss her husband. The supermarket kiss is a regular ritual for the Tuckers. So are the restaurant kiss and the traffic-light kiss. "I guess we do kiss a lot," says Mrs. Tucker, a 39-year-old mathematician at a money-management firm.</p>

<p>Mrs. Tucker is living happily ever after, and scientists are curious why. She belongs to a small class of men and women who say they live in the thrall of early love despite years of marriage, busy jobs and other daily demands that normally chip away at passion. ...</p>

<p class="entry-more-link"><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120243044114252137.html?mod=hps_us_inside_today">Continue reading "KEEPING LOVE ALIVE" on wsj.com &raquo;&raquo;</a></]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>CAN&apos;T GET ENOUGH OPRAH? WAIT A FEW YEARS</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.samschechner.com/2008/01/cant_get_enough_oprah_wait_a_f.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.samschechner.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=20" title="CAN'T GET ENOUGH OPRAH? WAIT A FEW YEARS" />
    <id>tag:www.samschechner.com,2008://1.20</id>
    
    <published>2008-01-16T05:56:16Z</published>
    <updated>2009-02-11T02:42:11Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Ms. Winfrey and Discovery Communications announced yesterday plans to launch a new channel -- which will go by the acronym, OWN -- in the second half of 2009. Ms. Winfrey will be the creative force behind the channel, developing programming on topics familiar to her viewers, such as dealing with bullying and recovering from divorce. But, at least at first, the channel will be entering a cluttered landscape without Ms. Winfrey&apos;s biggest asset, her top-rated talk show.

Ms. Winfrey hinted yesterday that her venture with Discovery was fated. She said she met with Mr. Zaslav two days after re-reading a 1992 journal entry in which she wrote about wanting to launch a cable channel with &quot;mindful&quot; as opposed to &quot;mindless&quot; programming.

About the coincidence, Ms. Winfrey says, &quot;That&apos;s all about what was supposed to happen.&quot;
</summary>
    <author>
        <name>The Wall Street Journal</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="articles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.samschechner.com/">
        <![CDATA[<h2 class="entry-subhead">Winfrey, Discovery to Launch New Network in Her Likeness, But Without Her TV Show</h2>
<font size=1><em>(The Wall Street Journal, Jan. 16, 2008)</em>
(<a href="http://www.samschechner.com/WSJ_-B001-20080116.pdf">PDF of original</a>;<a href="http://www.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=viewThis&etMailToID=1422303270">Link</a> to story on wsj.com)</font><br>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>by SAM SCHECHNER </p>

<p><b>Americans love</b> "The Oprah Winfrey Show," but are they ready for the Oprah Winfrey Network?</p>

<p>Ms. Winfrey and Discovery Communications announced yesterday plans to launch a new channel -- which will go by the acronym, OWN -- in the second half of 2009. Ms. Winfrey will be the creative force behind the channel, developing programming on topics familiar to her viewers, such as dealing with bullying and recovering from divorce. But, at least at first, the channel will be entering a cluttered landscape without Ms. Winfrey's biggest asset, her top-rated talk show. ...</p>

<p><br />
<p class="entry-more-link"><a href="http://www.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=viewThis&etMailToID=1422303270">Continue reading "CAN'T GET ENOUGH OPRAH?" on wsj.com &raquo;&raquo;</a></<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>THIS WRITERS&apos; STRIKE FEELS LIKE A RERUN FROM 1988</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.samschechner.com/2007/11/this_writers_strike_feels_like.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.samschechner.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=17" title="THIS WRITERS' STRIKE FEELS LIKE A RERUN FROM 1988" />
    <id>tag:www.samschechner.com,2007://1.17</id>
    
    <published>2007-11-12T05:01:17Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-02T19:31:58Z</updated>
    
    <summary>TV writers are once again fighting for a greater share of an unknown future -- this time digital rights. But shifts in the entertainment landscape over the last two decades -- from the explosion of original cable programming to the popularity of YouTube -- may make the industry even more susceptible to drastic changes in viewing habits and programming styles this time around.
</summary>
    <author>
        <name>The Wall Street Journal</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="articles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.samschechner.com/">
        <![CDATA[<h2 class="entry-subhead">New Technology Is Still<br>Big Issue, and Viewers <br>Could Be Lost Forever<br></h2>
<font size=1><em>(The Wall Street Journal, Nov. 12, 2007)</em>
(<a href="http://www.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=viewThis&etMailToID=1337534876">Link</a> to story on wsj.com)</font><br>
<br>
<img src=http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/MK-AM720_88STRI_20071111205302.jpg>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>by SAM SCHECHNER</p>

<p><b>Nineteen years ago,</b> when the Writers Guild of America last called a strike, television was still in its Pleistocene Era. DVDs, the Internet, time-shifting and ad-zapping didn't exist. Cable and home video were still relatively new. "The Cosby Show" was No. 1. And much of the cast of "Gossip Girl" was barely out of diapers.</p>

<p>But the underlying issues in the strike were pretty much the same as they are this time. ...<br />
<p class="entry-more-link"><a href="http://www.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=viewThis&etMailToID=1337534876">Continue reading "THIS WRITERS STRIKE FEELS LIKE A RERUN FROM 1988" on wsj.com &raquo;&raquo;</a></p><br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>MARCH OF THE INCONVENIENT TRUTHS</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.samschechner.com/2007/08/march_of_the_inconvenient_trut.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.samschechner.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=16" title="MARCH OF THE INCONVENIENT TRUTHS" />
    <id>tag:www.samschechner.com,2007://1.16</id>
    
    <published>2007-08-17T06:01:16Z</published>
    <updated>2009-02-11T02:41:18Z</updated>
    
    <summary>An unusual number of explicitly political documentaries are heading to theaters, driven by political discontent and philanthropists who want to change the world. But the spike may be coming as America&apos;s stomach for such sobering fare is starting to flag: Ticket sales this year for documentaries are down about 25% to roughly $27 million compared with this point last year.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>The Wall Street Journal</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="articles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.samschechner.com/">
        <![CDATA[<h2 class="entry-subhead">Philanthropists Drive Doc Boom;<br>But Demand May Flag; <br>'Terrors of the Moment'<br></h2>
<font size=1><em>(The Wall Street Journal, August 17, 2007)</em>
(<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118730739623000325.html">Link</a> to story on wsj.com)</font><br>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>by SAM SCHECHNER</p>

<p><b>With last summer's</b> "An Inconvenient Truth," Al Gore managed to bump global warming to the top of the national consciousness -- and sell over $24 million of U.S. tickets. Now Leonardo DiCaprio is betting he can repeat the feat.<br />
 <br />
Mr. DiCaprio hosts, narrates and partly funded "The 11th Hour," a documentary out today that paints a bleak picture of humanity's prospects unless environmental policy is shifted almost immediately. It's just one of an unusual number of politically motivated documentaries slated to hit theaters in coming months, from a Darfur film featuring Don Cheadle to "Taxi to the Dark Side," which uses the death of an Afghan taxi driver to examine U.S. detention policies.</p>

<p>But America's stomach for such sobering fare may be starting to flag. Ticket sales this ...</p>

<p class="entry-more-link"><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118730739623000325.html">Continue reading "MARCH OF THE INCONVENIENT TRUTHS" on wsj.com &raquo;&raquo;</a></p>
]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>CHABON&apos;S AMAZING REWRITE ADVENTURES</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.samschechner.com/2007/04/chabons_amazing_rewrite_advent.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.samschechner.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=14" title="CHABON'S AMAZING REWRITE ADVENTURES" />
    <id>tag:www.samschechner.com,2007://1.14</id>
    
    <published>2007-04-27T03:25:45Z</published>
    <updated>2009-02-11T02:46:03Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Next week, after five years, four drafts, two trips to Alaska and a title change, Michael Chabon&apos;s &quot;The Yiddish Policemen&apos;s Union,&quot; will arrive in stores.  &quot;The stakes are high,&quot; says Jonathan Burnham, HarperCollins&apos;s publisher, &quot;for Michael and all of us.&quot;</summary>
    <author>
        <name>The Wall Street Journal</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="articles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.samschechner.com/">
        <![CDATA[<h2 class="entry-subhead">Crafting a Seven-Figure Novel;<br>Starting Over in Third Person<br></h2>
<font size=1><em>(The Wall Street Journal, April 27, 2007)</em>
(<a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB117763122648184171-qJZn_1enVY_F6zJjUdO_QQlq9AI_20080425.html">Link</a> to story on wsj.com)</font><br>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>by SAM SCHECHNER</p>

<p><b>It was the end</b> of 2005, and Michael Chabon was rushing to finish his latest novel. The blurb was in his publisher's sales catalog. The on-sale date was set. Then his editor slammed on the brakes.</p>

<p>"I shudder now when I think that I would have published the old draft," says Mr. Chabon, author of the Pulitzer Prize-winning novel "The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier & Clay." Instead, after consultations with his editor, he spent about eight months reworking the entire book -- a murder mystery set in a fictional Yiddish-speaking Jewish homeland in Alaska. He added a flashback structure and pared down the language into a hard-boiled, Yiddish-inflected patois. "I felt like I had to invent a whole new dialect of English to finish it," he says.</p>

<p>Next week, after five years, four drafts, two trips to Alaska and a title change, "The Yiddish Policemen's Union," will arrive in stores. While long gestation periods and multiple drafts aren't unusual in the publishing industry, the time and effort expended on behalf of Mr. Chabon's vision are illustrations of the book's importance to HarperCollins, which won it in a four-way, seven-figure auction in 2002, when it was little more than a one-and-a-half-page proposal. Now the company has again bet big, printing 200,000 copies of the finished product, Mr. Chabon's first full-length adult novel since winning the Pulitzer in 2001. </p>

<p>"The stakes are high," says Jonathan Burnham, HarperCollins's publisher, "for Michael and all of us."...</p>

<p class="entry-more-link"><a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB117763122648184171-qJZn_1enVY_F6zJjUdO_QQlq9AI_20080425.html">Continue reading "CHABON'S AMAZING REWRITE ADVENTURES" on wsj.com &raquo;&raquo;</a></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>PLANE HAS SNAKES, NEEDS VIEWERS</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.samschechner.com/2006/08/plane_has_snakes_needs_viewers.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.samschechner.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=9" title="PLANE HAS SNAKES, NEEDS VIEWERS" />
    <id>tag:www.samschechner.com,2006://1.9</id>
    
    <published>2006-08-18T05:47:51Z</published>
    <updated>2008-02-12T17:02:42Z</updated>
    
    <summary>In one scene, Mr. Jackson&apos;s character repeatedly uses an Oedipal expletive to describe both the snakes and the plane.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>The Wall Street Journal</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="articles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.samschechner.com/">
        <![CDATA[<h2 class="entry-subhead">Thriller's Debut Will Test<br>
&nbsp Online-Fan Marketing<br></h2>
<font size=1><em>(The Wall Street Journal, Aug. 18, 2006)</em>
(<a href="http://www.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=viewThis&etMailToID=1605666652">Link</a> to story on wsj.com)</font><br>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>by SAM SCHECHNER</p>

<p><b>IT MAY BE</b> a horror flick, but "Snakes on a Plane" is becoming something of a suspense thriller for Hollywood insiders, too.</p>

<p>The movie, which opens today, has generated an unusually large wave of Internet buzz and anticipation almost entirely on the strength of its self-explanatory title. For several months, fans have created Web sites such as snakesonablog.com and parody videos with names like "Raccoons on a Space Shuttle." Devotees have even speculated about how Samuel L. Jackson, who stars as a Federal Bureau of Investigation agent, would react verbally to being trapped on a serpent-filled trans-Pacific flight.</p>

<p>But "Snakes" is also turning into a test of whether a home-grown marketing effort spearheaded by bloggers and amateur filmmakers can help propel a wide-release movie to a successful opening. New Line Cinema has decided not to screen the movie for critics and instead embraced its online fans, allowing them to copy and splice together unauthorized videos drawn from official trailers and other publicity materials. Also, the filmmakers added new scenes to the film, including one where Mr. Jackson's character delivers an exclamation similar to one a sound-alike had uttered in a fan trailer. In it, Mr. Jackson repeatedly uses an Oedipal expletive to describe both the snakes and the plane. ...</p>

<p><br />
<p class="entry-more-link"><a href="http://www.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=viewThis&etMailToID=1605666652">Continue reading "PLANE HAS SNAKES, NEEDS VIEWERS" on wsj.com &raquo;&raquo;</a></p><br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>THE HUNK SHORTAGE</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.samschechner.com/2006/02/the_hunk_shortage.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.samschechner.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5" title="THE HUNK SHORTAGE" />
    <id>tag:www.samschechner.com,2006://1.5</id>
    
    <published>2006-02-17T06:09:11Z</published>
    <updated>2008-02-12T17:03:48Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The television industry has just kicked off its annual casting season for pilot shows, from which broadcast executives will select new series for this coming fall. But the major networks are all having trouble finding what has become one of the industry&apos;s most prized commodities: studs who can act. </summary>
    <author>
        <name>The Wall Street Journal</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="articles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.samschechner.com/">
        <![CDATA[<h2 class="entry-subhead">To Fill New Dramas, TV Casting Directors <br>
 &nbsp Tussle Over Hot Guys Who Can Act; <br> &nbsp Taking the Search to Edmonton</h2>
<font size=1><em>(The Wall Street Journal, Feb. 17, 2006)</em>
(<a href="http://www.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=viewThis&etMailToID=1011393805">Link</a> to story on wsj.com)</font><br>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>by SAM SCHECHNER</p>

<p><b>HIS NAME</b> is one of the hottest in network television this spring. He is being pursued by some of the most influential casting directors in Hollywood. And you've probably never heard of him.</p>

<p>Over the past few weeks, Michael Vartan, the cute love interest from the movie "Monster-in-Law" and the heartthrob on TV's "Alias," has found himself on a short list of actors who are parrying multiple offers to star in new TV pilots. Why? He represents a commodity for which demand has grown to outpace supply over the last few years: sexy, rugged-looking guys who can act.</p>

<p class="entry-more-link"><a href="http://www.emailthis.clickability.com/et/emailThis?clickMap=viewThis&etMailToID=1011393805">Continue reading "THE HUNK SHORTAGE" on wsj.com &raquo;&raquo;</a></p>
]]>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>RESPEK!</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.samschechner.com/2004/09/respek.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.samschechner.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4" title="RESPEK!" />
    <id>tag:www.samschechner.com,2004://1.4</id>
    
    <published>2004-09-20T11:54:53Z</published>
    <updated>2008-02-12T17:04:03Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The American version of Da Ali G Show recently wrapped up its second season on HBO, and, once again, a long list of prominent Americans have been embarrassed. How can so many supposedly media-savvy operators—even members of the intelligence community—still be so easily fooled? Don&apos;t these people have assistants with subscriptions to HBO or, at the very least, access to the outside world? </summary>
    <author>
        <name>Sam Schechner</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="articles" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.samschechner.com/">
        <![CDATA[<h2 class="entry-subhead">How does Ali G keep conning famous guests?</h2>
<font size=1><em>(Slate Magazine, Sept. 2004)</em>
(<a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2106886">Link</a> to story on <i>Slate</i>)</font>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>by SAM SCHECHNER</p>

<p><b>THE AMERICAN VERSION</b> of <i><a href="http://www.hbo.com/alig/">Da Ali G Show</a></i> recently wrapped up its second season on HBO, and, once again, a long list of prominent Americans have been embarrassed. Somehow, Sacha Baron Cohen, in the guise of a British would-be gangsta with a penchant for malapropisms and misunderstandings, managed to secure another passel of interviews with people like former EPA Administrator Christine Todd Whitman (who conceded that, yes, whale feces "have got to be massive") and archconservative Patrick Buchanan (who said that Saddam Hussein "was using BLTs on the Kurds"). In one episode, Richard Kerr, a former deputy director of the CIA, found himself debating whether terrorists could drive a train into the White House.</p>

<p>How can so many supposedly media-savvy operators—even members of the intelligence community—still be so easily fooled? Don't these people have assistants with subscriptions to HBO or, at the very least, access to the outside world? These questions represent more than idle curiosity. Ali G managed just two seasons in Britain before being forced stateside to seek more gullible guests. A third season has yet to be scheduled here, and fans like me want to know if his techniques could possibly work one more time.</p>

<p>No one from Ali G would agree to speak about the show's methods, and even its former producers maintain a strict cult of silence about their work. But according to accounts from several people who have fallen for Baron Cohen's ruses—some of whom were too humiliated to go on the record—the come-on begins with a flattering letter sent to an unsuspecting target. Sam Donaldson says his letter was sent to his news assistant, bypassing ABC's more skeptical publicity department. Other guests are former officials or lone personalities without a dedicated PR staff to sniff out fakes. Buchanan, for example, handles his own press along with his wife, Shelly. "It all seemed very legitimate," he told me.</p>

<p>One source, who declined to be named, provided <i>Slate</i> with a <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2106908/">copy of one such letter</a>, which explains that an entity named Somerford Brooke Productions is creating a six-part series called "The Making of Modern America (working title)." Lauding the recipient's "unbridled reputation," the letter invites him to appear on a show that will "present issues in a fresh and innovative way that will engage young viewers." It says that the producers hope the show, ahem, "won't just be seen in the UK but world-wide."</p>

<p>In other words, it's all fastidiously accurate, but vague. The letter is so thorough that the URL in the e-mail address at the bottom actually goes to Somerford Brooke's fictitious one-page <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20041115090111/http://somerfordbrooke.com/">Web site</a>. (Potential interviewees for Baron Cohen's libidinous Kazakh persona, Borat, say they have been contacted by United World Television, which maintains a suspiciously similar <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20041115175109/www.glitterarty.co.uk/unitedworl">site</a>.) The producers have even gone to the trouble to make sure Somerford Brooke and their other fronts are officially registered companies—all at the same address that houses <a href="http://www.fremantlemedia.com/">FremantleMedia</a>, the parent of <a href="http://www.talkbackthames.tv/">TalkbackThames</a>, which produced <i>Da Ali G Show</i> for HBO and Britain's Channel 4. Repeated voice mails left with the letter's purported author, Saeeda Khanum, went unanswered; one person reached at Talkback who had heard of her said, uncomfortably, that he hadn't seen her in months. "I don't know anything, mate."</p>

<p>While some of Ali G's marks agree to the interviews immediately ("I popped right away," Donaldson confessed), others take more massaging. One person who handles press for a political celebrity featured in the first U.S. season ("It does not reflect well on my professionalism to have been fooled") said that he turned down repeated entreaties for an interview. Only when a MSNBC producer vouched for "United World Productions" did he finally relent, to his regret. "We truly left there thinking he was the stupidest person ever," he said of Ali G. "I was very contentious."</p>

<p>That's why, even before the interviews begin, Ali G's producers start making excuses. As the guest signs a weighty but standard-looking release, producers explain that they have a rather unorthodox host, a supposed "British rap star" who, they assure, is very popular with the young-adult target audience. Then Baron Cohen bounds into the room, already in character, and the cameras start rolling. "I don't discriminate on the basis of clothing, as long as there is some and it isn't too dirty," Donaldson says of his decision to continue at that point.</p>

<p>But while producers can send out fake letters from official-sounding companies more or less indefinitely, the number of people who will stick around when this Hilfiger-suited oaf walks on camera is diminishing rapidly. That's why Ali G was forced to leave Britain in the first place. "[T]he character had reached such a saturation point that everybody knew who Ali G was, from eight-year-olds to 80-year-olds," the series' co-creator, Dan Mazer, <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/tv_and_radio/2644979.stm">told</a> the BBC in 2003.</p>

<p>It's unlikely that Ali G himself can survive even a fraction of that exposure again. While <i>The Daily Show</i>, for example, manages to mine humor from fake-news features whose interviewees who are at least somewhat in on the joke, Ali G relies on his victims' reluctance to challenge his intellectual credentials or Brit-hop patois. The joke won't work when they know he's a fiction. The only way to save Ali may be to send him even further afield—to find yet another country as pompous and credulous as America. But that's a tall order.</p>

<p>More likely is a larger role for Baron Cohen's two other, often funnier, personae: Borat and campy Austrian fashion Nazi, Bruno. Both are too outlandish to score megawatt guests but make up for it by goading their charges into more outrageously offensive behavior. (Borat got a country and western bar to sing along as he belted, "Throw the Jew down the well/ So my country can be free," which ranked among the year's most caustically funny moments in television.)</p>

<p>There are hints that the show may indeed be headed in that direction. "The Borat character still has loads of life left in him, possibly more than Ali," Mazer <a href="http://www.webgeordie.co.uk/borat/interview01.htm">told</a> the Unofficial Borat Homepage last year, well before shooting the second U.S. season. Whether he still feels that way now is anyone's guess—his representatives would not return phone calls. But, as a fan, I can't help but hang on something else he said in that interview: "Borat will be back and he will loom large once more."</p>

<p>---<br />
Sam Schechner wrote this piece in 2004, when he was a freelance writer. He is currently a reporter at the Wall Street Journal.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

</feed> 

